1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00179610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for the determination of viability of ischemic rabbit intestine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major limitation of this study is that intraoperative clinical judgment was used in the determination of intestinal gangrene, which may have overestimated the presence of gangrene compared to other techniques such as fluorescence or laser Doppler ultrasound [ 48 - 50 ]. However, there was > 95% concordance between histological assessment and clinical judgment in this population suggesting that clinical judgment was an acceptable method for intraoperative gangrene assessment for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major limitation of this study is that intraoperative clinical judgment was used in the determination of intestinal gangrene, which may have overestimated the presence of gangrene compared to other techniques such as fluorescence or laser Doppler ultrasound [ 48 - 50 ]. However, there was > 95% concordance between histological assessment and clinical judgment in this population suggesting that clinical judgment was an acceptable method for intraoperative gangrene assessment for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%