1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)83857-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for outlier detection and their effects on the classification results for a particular data base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abs, absolute numbers; ↓, decreased compared to control age-matched range. Patient P1 P2 Ig at diagnosis (g/L; range ( Duda et al., 1973 )) IgG 0.46 (4.0-11.0) , IgA 0.45 (0.1-1.6) , IgM 3.24 (0.5-1.8) Unknown T/B/NK cells at diagnosis (abs ​× ​10 9 /L; range ( Gomez et al., 1990 )) T cells 3.66 (0.9-4.5) , CD4 + T cells 0.51 (0.5-2.4) , CD8 + T cells 3.15 (0.3-1.6) , B cells 0.26 (0.2-2.1) , NK cells 0.26 (0.1-1.0) Unknown T/B/NK cells (abs ​× ​10 9 /L; range ( Gomez et al., 1990 )) [B cell subsets in abs, cells/ul] Age 22 CD3 + T cells 0.23 (0.7-2.1); CD4 + T cells 0.1 (0.3-1.4) : Naïve (CD4 + /CD27 + /CD45RA + ) 14.4%, Memory (CD4 + /CD27 + CD45RA − ) 83.6%, Effector Memory (CD4 + /CD27 + /CD45RA +/- ) 2.0%; CD8 + T cells 0.1 (0.2-1.2) : Naïve (CD8 + CD27 + CD45RA + ) 37.7%, Memory (CD8 + /CD27 + /CD45RA − ) 33.2%, Effector Memory (CD8 + /CD27 - /CD45RA +/- ) 29.1%; CD19 + B cells 0.01 (0.1-0.5) : Naïve (IgD + /CD27 - ) 7 (57–447) , Marginal Zone/Natural effector (IgD + /CD27 + ) 1 (9-88), Memory (IgD − /CD27 + ) 1 (13–122) [IgM + 48% (4-37), IgM − 52%]; CD16.56 + CD3 − NK cells 0.04 (0.09-0.6) Age 43 CD3 + T cells 0.53 (0.7-2.1) CD19 + B cells 0.09 (0.1-0.5) : CD16.56 + CD3 − NK cells 0.15 (0.09-0.6) Ig (g/L; range ( …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abs, absolute numbers; ↓, decreased compared to control age-matched range. Patient P1 P2 Ig at diagnosis (g/L; range ( Duda et al., 1973 )) IgG 0.46 (4.0-11.0) , IgA 0.45 (0.1-1.6) , IgM 3.24 (0.5-1.8) Unknown T/B/NK cells at diagnosis (abs ​× ​10 9 /L; range ( Gomez et al., 1990 )) T cells 3.66 (0.9-4.5) , CD4 + T cells 0.51 (0.5-2.4) , CD8 + T cells 3.15 (0.3-1.6) , B cells 0.26 (0.2-2.1) , NK cells 0.26 (0.1-1.0) Unknown T/B/NK cells (abs ​× ​10 9 /L; range ( Gomez et al., 1990 )) [B cell subsets in abs, cells/ul] Age 22 CD3 + T cells 0.23 (0.7-2.1); CD4 + T cells 0.1 (0.3-1.4) : Naïve (CD4 + /CD27 + /CD45RA + ) 14.4%, Memory (CD4 + /CD27 + CD45RA − ) 83.6%, Effector Memory (CD4 + /CD27 + /CD45RA +/- ) 2.0%; CD8 + T cells 0.1 (0.2-1.2) : Naïve (CD8 + CD27 + CD45RA + ) 37.7%, Memory (CD8 + /CD27 + /CD45RA − ) 33.2%, Effector Memory (CD8 + /CD27 - /CD45RA +/- ) 29.1%; CD19 + B cells 0.01 (0.1-0.5) : Naïve (IgD + /CD27 - ) 7 (57–447) , Marginal Zone/Natural effector (IgD + /CD27 + ) 1 (9-88), Memory (IgD − /CD27 + ) 1 (13–122) [IgM + 48% (4-37), IgM − 52%]; CD16.56 + CD3 − NK cells 0.04 (0.09-0.6) Age 43 CD3 + T cells 0.53 (0.7-2.1) CD19 + B cells 0.09 (0.1-0.5) : CD16.56 + CD3 − NK cells 0.15 (0.09-0.6) Ig (g/L; range ( …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data points that exceeded 3 scaled median absolute deviations from the median ( isoutlier function in Matlab) of the corresponding class per variable, were considered outliers and excluded from further analysis. Excluded outliers were interpolated with the mean of their corresponding class per variable (mean interpolation) ( Duda et al., 1973 ; Gomez et al., 1990 ) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, data points that exceeded 3 scaled median absolute deviations from the median ( isoutlier function in Matlab) of the corresponding class per variable, were considered outliers and excluded from further analysis. Excluded outliers were interpolated with the mean of their corresponding class per variable (mean interpolation) (98,99).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, patellar length measurements were conducted with linear discriminant outlier detection. Thus, data that would be used for gender prediction were cleared of outliers (13). The first 80% of the patellar length measurements were set as the training set and the remaining 20% were set as the test set.…”
Section: Data Cleaning Training and Test Sets And Performance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%