1981
DOI: 10.1071/sr9810275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for measuring severity of water repellence of sandy soils and assessment of some factors that affect its measurement

Abstract: Rapid methods for measuring the severity of water repellence were assessed in 101 sandy soils from South Australia. The molarity of aqueous ethanol droplets that were absorbed by the soil in 10 s, the time of water droplet entry and the infiltration rate of water from a small ring infiltrometer were compared with the soil-water contact angle and with each other. Relationships between the tests were fitted by linear, quadratic and cubic regressions and were highly significant (100r2 = 70-92). The relationships … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
362
3
18

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 475 publications
(395 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
12
362
3
18
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that increasing concentrations of ethanol lessened the retentive behaviour of the soil column. This result is not unexpected, as ethanol breaks the surface tension of repellent soil, allowing increased penetration (King, 1981). Table 3 shows the retention time (t R ) and capacity factor (k') of hydrocarbons on the sandy soil column (G-01) using different ethanol mobile phase concentrations.…”
Section: Effect Of Ethanol On Aromatic Hydrocarbon Movement In Surfacmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that increasing concentrations of ethanol lessened the retentive behaviour of the soil column. This result is not unexpected, as ethanol breaks the surface tension of repellent soil, allowing increased penetration (King, 1981). Table 3 shows the retention time (t R ) and capacity factor (k') of hydrocarbons on the sandy soil column (G-01) using different ethanol mobile phase concentrations.…”
Section: Effect Of Ethanol On Aromatic Hydrocarbon Movement In Surfacmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Hydrophobic, soil organic matter components such as humic, fulvic and fatty acids, impart a water repellent character to a soil (Anderson et al, 1995). Ethanol has been used in many studies on water repellent soils (King, 1981;Roy and McGill, 1997) as it can break the surface tension of repellent soil, allowing increased infiltration. Ethanol present within diesel fuel would, therefore, enhance infiltration of diesel fuel into the soil profile by lessening the adsorptive capacity of the hydrophobic sites of soil organic matter components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). From the TPH vs. MED function, a value of 2,400 mg/kg was calculated to result in very severe water repellency according to the scale proposed by King (1981).…”
Section: Water Repellency In Sandy Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nove gotas d'água, cada uma com 0,033 ± 0,00202 mL foram colocadas ao acaso sobre o solo seco ao ar e os tempos de infiltração cronometrados. O tempo médio de infiltração das nove gotas foi utilizado para classificar os agregados quanto a seu grau de repelência, como proposto por King (1981).…”
Section: Variáveis Morfológicas Avaliadas Via úMidaunclassified