2005
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.43.9.4602-4606.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Methods for Detection of Vaccinia Virus in Patient Specimens

Abstract: We analyzed a shell vial culture assay (SVA), real-time PCR, and a direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) for rapid detection of vaccinia virus from vaccination sites of Dryvax vaccine recipients. Of 47 samples assayed, 100% were positive by PCR, 89% were positive by SVA, and 40% were positive by DFA. DFA was limited by the need for adequate numbers of cells, with 32% of samples inadequate for interpretation. DFA performed better with specimens from patients who had not previously received the vaccine. PCR wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaccinia virus WR strain [ 28 ] was used to infect HeLa and HuH 7 cells in this study, following previously published procedures for virus amplification and plaque assay [ 22 , 29 ]. Cytosine arabosinide (ara C), where used, was added to the cells at a concentration of 40 μg/ml.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccinia virus WR strain [ 28 ] was used to infect HeLa and HuH 7 cells in this study, following previously published procedures for virus amplification and plaque assay [ 22 , 29 ]. Cytosine arabosinide (ara C), where used, was added to the cells at a concentration of 40 μg/ml.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccinia virus WR strain was used to infect HeLa cells in this study, following previously published procedures for virus amplification and plaque assay [ 23 , 24 ]. Cytosine arabosinide (ara C), where used, was added to the cells at a concentration of 40 μg/ml [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is laborious due to required additional specimen manipulation, including fixing, staining and labeling [reviewed by Trindade et al, 2007]. Molecular and immunological techniques, including real-time PCR [Putkuri et al, 2009], nested and semi-nested PCR [Sá nchez-Seco et al, 2006;Damaso et al, 2007], PCR-RFLP [Meyer et al, 1997], and Western blot assays [Fedorko et al, 2005] have been applied widely in OPV research. The use of real-time PCR for the detection of VACV directly from lesions without DNA or virus manipulation was described by de Souza Trindade et al [2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%