Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data

Abstract

-Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.survival / Cox proportional hazards / Weibull / quantitative trait loci

Identification of several small main-effect QTLs and a large number of epistatic QTLs for drought tolerance related traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

“…In case of CIM using QTL Cartographer, 105 M-QTLs were identified for various drought component traits. As the QTL identification is a statistical approach, the possibility of identifying false positive and false negative QTL for the thresholds and mapping approaches used exists (McElroy et al 2006 ; Mackay and Powell 2007 ). However, reliability of QTLs identified may be enhanced by identification of QTL using more than one software.…”

Marker-based linkage map of Andean common bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) and mapping of QTLs underlying popping ability traits

“…Three closely related popping traits such as PDI, EC, and PUS have been analysed and the reliability of the QTLs associated to these traits has been enhanced by using several software programs, which decreased the risk of detecting false positive and negative QTLs [ 53 - 55 ]. Therefore, single and multi-environment QTL analyses were performed to dissect the genetic architecture of popping ability in nuña bean.…”

Mapping candidate QTLs related to plant persistency in red clover

“…A total of 10 and 23 regions were identified where single effect QTLs related to plant persistency mapped in the 272 × WF1680 and the HR × R130 populations, respectively. Because the QTL identification was based on statistical approaches, the possibility of identifying false positive and false negative QTLs for the thresholds and mapping approaches used still exists (McElroy et al 2006 ; Mackay and Powell 2007 ). However, if QTLs were identified by multiple approaches, the reliability of the QTLs is likely to be enhanced.…”