2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods for analysis of functional observation battery (FOB) data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple comparisons (MannWhitney U test). 33 Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple comparisons (MannWhitney U test). 33 Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of group sizes was reported (i.e. n=3 to 30), but a majority of respondents (Moscardo et al, 2007;Markgraf et al, 2010) to identify drug effects in FOB studies. Results from the current survey confirm that a majority of participants undertake statistical analysis (combined 74%), at least for some parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting a lower threshold than this (ie, 3/6) is arguably prudent when in the business of hazard detection. Statistical analysis is more appropriate when using a larger group size and when ranking the severity of the observed parameters, but even so, when Markgraf et al (2010) Pharmacological effects identified during FOB may differ between adult and juvenile animals (Himmel, 2008), justifying careful designs supported by regulatory guidance documents (EMEA, 2008;FDA, 2006) to investigate possible neurotoxicity in a younger population when applicable. Authier et al 2015JPTM 6/2/2016 A wide range of approved drugs are associated with drug induced sleep disturbances such as insomnia, including beta-blockers (Chang et al, 2013;Moser, 1979), corticosteroids (Ciriaco et al, 2013), selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) (Asnis, et al, 1999) or acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (Cooke et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After dermal irritation scoring, functional observational battery (FOB) was conducted to investigate gross functional deficits due to dermal exposure of extracts as described elsewhere. 37,38 Exploratory behavior in hole-board test Followed by FOB, the exploratory behavior was assessed using a holeboard apparatus in all treatment groups. This apparatus consisted of 40 cm square floor with 16 equally spaced holes of 3 cm diameter and mounted on four legs of 25 cm height.…”
Section: Functional Observational Battery (Fob)mentioning
confidence: 99%