2012
DOI: 10.3354/ab00391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methodologies to quantify the effects of age and area of marine reserves on the density and size of targeted species

Abstract: We quantified the biological response of 2 exploited species to marine reserve (MR) protection by comparing meta-analysis results based on response ratio (RR) and Hedges' g statistics. To determine the effect of MR area and age on biological responses, a RR analysis was performed on density and size data for both species from sites inside versus outside 13 MRs. Most MRs supported a greater density of larger individuals than unprotected areas. Linear and non-linear plots of MR age and area with respect to speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(83 reference statements)
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the TS data recorded during the dry season, the trend was an increase over the years, with a low statistical significance (p<0.2) due to the low number of samples. The increase of the mean fish size in the protected area was in accordance with observations done in similar ecosystems [45,46]. During the wet season, the recruitment leaded to lower values of TS, due to the presence of small fish; TS were statistically different from those in the dry season, but no trend was apparent throughout the years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For the TS data recorded during the dry season, the trend was an increase over the years, with a low statistical significance (p<0.2) due to the low number of samples. The increase of the mean fish size in the protected area was in accordance with observations done in similar ecosystems [45,46]. During the wet season, the recruitment leaded to lower values of TS, due to the presence of small fish; TS were statistically different from those in the dry season, but no trend was apparent throughout the years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There is a growing body of research investigating biodiversity patterns within and between marine reserves [ 63 ], but most of these focus on comparatively small reserves (e.g. <2500 hectare reserves in [ 64 ] compared to 7,174,400 hectares of the Oceanic Shoals CMR). There are few studies of biodiversity patterns at large reserve scales, and these suggest differences both within and between reserves, variations of which seem dependent on environmental gradients and heterogeneity encompassed within a given area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach that has been used to quantify MR effects is meta-analysis. Several meta-analyses have been performed to describe the effects of MRs (e.g., , Côté et al 2001, Díaz-Guisado 2012. Different effect-size metrics have been frequently employed in meta-analysis, including the response ratio (RR).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RR is a unit-less metric that quantifies the proportional change resulting from MR implementation by measuring the relative differences in a biological response (e.g., density) inside versus outside the MR (Adams et al 1997. The response ratio metric is biologically more relevant than other metrics e.g., hedges' g, that is most commonly used and which does not yield a clear biological interpretation , Osenberg et al 1999b, Díaz -Guisado et al 2012. Meta-analysis of MRs has been criticised due to the majority of studies they examine are CI designs (Edgar 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation