Comparison of Metalworking Fluid Mist Exposures from Machining with Different Levels of Machine Enclosure

Abstract

This research investigated the efficacy of machine enclosures in reducing employee exposures to metalworking fluid mist. Four hundred fifty-five personal samples from automotive machining and grinding operations collected over six years were divided into three groups based on the type and extent of enclosure and local exhaust ventilation. The sample groups were (1) machining equipment with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) total enclosures and local exhaust ventilation, (2) machining equipment with partial or retrofit enclosures and local exhaust ventilation, and (3) machining equipment with little or no enclosure. The results of the Mann Whitney U test of the three data sets indicated that the employees operating equipment with OEM enclosures had significantly lower exposures than employees operating equipment that had either of the other two control methods. There was no difference between the exposures of operators of equipment with retrofit enclosures compared to operators of equipment without enclosures. The median exposure for operators of equipment with OEM enclosures was 0.21 mg/m3, about half that found with the other two control methods. Each of the data sets was compared to exposure criteria; 100% of the exposures associated with OEM enclosures were below 1.0 mg/m3, and 90% of the exposures were below 0.5 mg/m3. The other two methods were not as effective as OEM in reducing exposure to below these criteria. These results indicate that OEM enclosures provide the most effective control of metalworking fluid mist exposure.

Development of an Imaging System and Its Application in the Study of Cutting Fluid Atomization in a Turning Process

“…One of the negative aspects associated with the use of a cutting fluid is health concerns and in particular the inhalation of cutting fluid mist produced during the machining process (Hands et al, 1996). One of the principal mechanisms associated with cutting fluid mist formation is atomization.…”

Experimental and Analytical Efforts to Characterize Cutting Fluid Mist Formation and Behavior in Machining

“…Negative health effects due to dermal contact and fluid mist inhalation have raised concerns regarding the use of cutting fluids, and thus the industrial hygiene community is directing ever more attention to cutting fluid exposure. (3) In addition, fluid splashing, spillage, and the "carrying off" of fluid on metal chips can ultimately lead to inadvertent contamination of groundwater, lakes, and rivers with the fluid as well as metal fines. Upon disposal, the treatment of used fluids prior to introduction into wastewater streams is not totally effective and also represents a significant and increasing cost (in some cases exceeding the purchase price of the fluid).…”

Advancing Cutting Technology

“…Pre-treatment and treatment of cutting fluids serves to reduce the environmentally damaging influence of the fluid, but does not completely eliminate the potential hazard. In addition to the environmental concerns associated with cutting fluids, several studies have shown that humans exposed to cutting fluids through dermal and inhalation pathways often develop health problems [70]. Motivated by health problems related to cutting fluid mist inhalation, several recent research efforts have focused on investigating the mechanisms associated with cutting fluid mist formation [71].…”