2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2016.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mesospheric winds from a high-altitude meteorological analysis system and meteor radar observations during the boreal winters of 2009–2010 and 2012–2013

Abstract: We present a study of horizontal winds in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) during the boreal winters of 2009-2010 and 2012-2013 produced with a new high-altitude numerical weather prediction (NWP) system. This system is based on a modified version of the Navy Global Environmental Model (NAVGEM) with an extended vertical domain up to ∼116 km altitude coupled with a hybrid four-dimensional variational (4DVAR) data assimilation system that assimilates both standard operational meteorological observatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
122
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over 3 million observations in each 6-hr window from radiosondes, pibals, dropsondes, driftsondes, land and ship surface observations, fixed and drifting buoys, aircraft observations, and several middle and lower atmospheric satellite mission-based winds, temperatures, and compositional data are used for the assimilation. Horizontal winds from NAVGEM-HA analyses were reported to compare well with the middle-, low-, and high-latitude SMR observations from both Northern and Southern hemispheres (McCormack et al, 2017). Additional technical details and validation of NAVGEM-HA wind analyses can be found in McCormack et al (2017).…”
Section: Navgem-hamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Over 3 million observations in each 6-hr window from radiosondes, pibals, dropsondes, driftsondes, land and ship surface observations, fixed and drifting buoys, aircraft observations, and several middle and lower atmospheric satellite mission-based winds, temperatures, and compositional data are used for the assimilation. Horizontal winds from NAVGEM-HA analyses were reported to compare well with the middle-, low-, and high-latitude SMR observations from both Northern and Southern hemispheres (McCormack et al, 2017). Additional technical details and validation of NAVGEM-HA wind analyses can be found in McCormack et al (2017).…”
Section: Navgem-hamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Unlike the earlier NOGAPS‐ALPHA system, which used a three‐dimensional variational (3DVAR) DA algorithm that consolidates observations within a 6‐hr window and used static model covariance estimates, the hybrid 4DVAR NAVDAS‐AR in NAVGEM‐HA accounts for time‐varying observations within the 6‐hr window through a linear combination of climatological covariances and ensemble‐based model covariances to obtain more realistic estimates of forecast model uncertainties within the DA algorithm. The NAVGEM‐HA system was recently validated by McCormack et al () with multiple independent ground‐based medium frequency radar wind observations over the 2009–2010 and 2012–2013 Northern Hemisphere winters.…”
Section: Model Simulations Data Sets and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report we evaluate in detail the impact that SD nudging and the Stauffer and Seaman (, ) nudging technique (hereafter referred to as 4D Tendency nudging, where the 4D denotes three dimensions in space and one in time) have on short‐term TI variability. For this purpose, we performed a set of numerical experiments with the TIME‐GCM that constrain the meteorological fields in the stratosphere and mesosphere using NAVGEM‐HA (Navy Global Environmental Model a high‐altitude version; McCormack et al, ), during the 2010 boreal winter months that covers the 2010 SSW period from mid‐January to mid‐February. TIME‐GCM simulations constrained by NAVGEM‐HA winds and temperatures based on the SD nudging methodologies described by Maute et al (; hereafter referred to as SD zm ) and J. C. Wang et al (; hereafter referred to as SD full ) are presented and compared with those that employed the 4D Tendency nudging technique (hereafter referred to as 4D Tend ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general the statistical uncertainties tend to become larger when fewer meteors are included in the wind fit. A more detailed comparison of the obtained MR winds with the Navy Global Environmental Model (NAVGEM) is given in McCormack et al (2016).…”
Section: Meteor Radar Observation and Wind Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%