2020
DOI: 10.3906/sag-1902-228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell sheets and chondrocyte sheets in a rabbit growth plate injury model

Abstract: Background/aim: The treatment of posttraumatic deformities and differences in length between the extremities resulting from physeal injury remains controversial. The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of tissue-engineered, monolayer, and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell sheets and chondrocyte sheets for physeal arrest treatment and to investigate cell sheet technology as a novel method for cell transplantation in physeal cartilage repair. Materials and methods: A proximal tibial physeal injury was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioinspired scaffolds for the implantation of growth plate defects were designed to be 2 mm thick per previous studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 ]. During 3D printing, the layer height was set as 0.2 mm, and each bionic scaffold had 10 layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioinspired scaffolds for the implantation of growth plate defects were designed to be 2 mm thick per previous studies [ 25 , 30 , 31 ]. During 3D printing, the layer height was set as 0.2 mm, and each bionic scaffold had 10 layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the cell sheets developed in the present study facilitated growth plate cartilage regeneration and sufficiently prevented the development of a bone bridge. 188 It is worth mentioning that cartilage cell sheets made from a thermal responsive culture dish (TRCD) combined with traditional bone marrow stimulation were tested in eight patients. Cell sheet transplantation has been shown to be safe and effective in cartilage regeneration in defect sites.…”
Section: Syntheticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include: i) use of various cell types, i.e., bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) or chondrocytes; ii) and various growth factors (TGFβ, IGF1, and FGF2) (Chen et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2020); iii) as well as different scaffolds composed of natural or synthetic material (Abdollahiyan et al, 2020), all with varying results. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used in engineering of cartilage due to their capability for self-renewal and their ability to secrete multiple growth factors (Gultekin et al, 2020). As well, there is an influx of MSCs to the injured growth plate site, suggesting that MSCs are naturally vital to the repair process (Zhou et al, 2004).…”
Section: Signaling In Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%