2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.10.21256920
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mental Health Symptoms Prior to and During COVID-19: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 134 Cohorts

Abstract: Objectives: The rapid pace, high volume, and limited quality of mental health evidence being generated during COVID-19 poses a barrier to effective decision-making. The objective of the present report is to compare mental health outcomes assessed during COVID-19 to outcomes prior to COVID-19 in the general population and other population groups. Design: Living systematic review. Data Sources: MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection: Citation Indexes, Chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(211 reference statements)
5
58
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[49][50][51][52] Likely risk factors include gender inequities and discrimination, higher rates of interpersonal stressors, and violence, 53,54 and many of these risk factors have been exacerbated for women during COVID-19. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Overall mental health does not appear to have changed substantively for the general population based on our main systematic review, 26 but there is concern that there could, nonetheless, be important sex-or gender-based differences. We found small symptom change differences that reflect relative worsening for women for 2 of 8 outcomes assessed, but no differences appeared to be clinically meaningful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49][50][51][52] Likely risk factors include gender inequities and discrimination, higher rates of interpersonal stressors, and violence, 53,54 and many of these risk factors have been exacerbated for women during COVID-19. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Overall mental health does not appear to have changed substantively for the general population based on our main systematic review, 26 but there is concern that there could, nonetheless, be important sex-or gender-based differences. We found small symptom change differences that reflect relative worsening for women for 2 of 8 outcomes assessed, but no differences appeared to be clinically meaningful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have aimed to assess the mental health consequences in societies and to identify risk groups and protective factors. Whereas some of the studies conducted in an early phase of the pandemic reported an alarming increase in psychological distress in the general community (Salari et al, 2020 ), later research with study designs of higher quality have indicated less dramatic mental health consequences of the pandemic (Prati & Mancini, 2021 ; Sun et al 2021 ). Some researchers have proposed that the observed increase of psychological distress in the community for the most part might be attributed to vulnerable groups (Public Health England, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 A living systematic review (ie, a systematic review that is continually updated) found that general mental health, anxiety, and depression symptoms did not worsen substantively in the general population in the early months of the pandemic. 3 Among people with pre-existing medical conditions, however, anxiety symptoms worsened significantly (three studies; n=2053; standardised mean difference [SMD] 0·27 [95% CI 0·01 to 0·54]) but depression symptoms did not change (three studies; N=2006; SMD 0·01 [–0·15 to 0·17]). 3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 Among people with pre-existing medical conditions, however, anxiety symptoms worsened significantly (three studies; n=2053; standardised mean difference [SMD] 0·27 [95% CI 0·01 to 0·54]) but depression symptoms did not change (three studies; N=2006; SMD 0·01 [–0·15 to 0·17]). 3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation