The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2013.2286569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Mechanical Vibration Between a Double-Stator Switched Reluctance Machine and a Conventional Switched Reluctance Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] [2]. The literature review has revealed that about 40% of electrical machines [induction machine, permanent magnet machine, switched reluctance machine (SRM)] are used for automotive applications and the SRMs are attracting increasing interest owning to the merits such as no permanent magnets and hence low cost, simple and robust rotor structure [2] [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] [2]. The literature review has revealed that about 40% of electrical machines [induction machine, permanent magnet machine, switched reluctance machine (SRM)] are used for automotive applications and the SRMs are attracting increasing interest owning to the merits such as no permanent magnets and hence low cost, simple and robust rotor structure [2] [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of their double-saliency structure, vibration and noise are the inherent issues caused by normal force fluctuations during phase current excitations [4], [5], which pose a drawback for the motors in noise sensitive applications. In these machines, the attraction force can be divided into tangential and radial components relative to the rotor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is more cost effective. Compared to conventional switched reluctance machines (SRMs), DSSRM has a potential of lower acoustic noise, lower vibration and higher utilization ratio of the space available [2], [3]. In order to increase power density in a conventional SRM, relatively smaller air gap is required, which will force the machine into a highly saturated mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%