2019
DOI: 10.2172/1565831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mechanical testing across micro- and meso- length scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As was discussed above, many have endeavored to use a spherical nanoindenter tip probe to measure small-scale stress-strain curves with limited or variable degrees of success [47]. However, spherical nanoindentation includes several practical difficulties because the uncertainty in the contact area is generally more significant for spheres than for other indenter shapes (see the variation in an asmanufactured cono-spherical tip geometry obtained from a leading tip supplier for more nuanced appreciation, as shown in Figures 4-7, which are adopted from [10].…”
Section: Actualization Of a Frustrum Instrumented Strength Microprobementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was discussed above, many have endeavored to use a spherical nanoindenter tip probe to measure small-scale stress-strain curves with limited or variable degrees of success [47]. However, spherical nanoindentation includes several practical difficulties because the uncertainty in the contact area is generally more significant for spheres than for other indenter shapes (see the variation in an asmanufactured cono-spherical tip geometry obtained from a leading tip supplier for more nuanced appreciation, as shown in Figures 4-7, which are adopted from [10].…”
Section: Actualization Of a Frustrum Instrumented Strength Microprobementioning
confidence: 99%