2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of mechanical properties of different reinforced glass-ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leucite-reinforced ceramics are not recommended for crowns in the posterior segment due to their lower mechanical properties compared to other glass ceramics [ 54 ]. However, their aesthetic qualities are sufficient, and the wear resistance of the enamel antagonist is similar to other glass ceramic materials [ 55 ]. In recent years, they have been replaced by lithium silicate ceramics, which have better physical properties and sufficient optical properties.…”
Section: Materials For Cad/cammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leucite-reinforced ceramics are not recommended for crowns in the posterior segment due to their lower mechanical properties compared to other glass ceramics [ 54 ]. However, their aesthetic qualities are sufficient, and the wear resistance of the enamel antagonist is similar to other glass ceramic materials [ 55 ]. In recent years, they have been replaced by lithium silicate ceramics, which have better physical properties and sufficient optical properties.…”
Section: Materials For Cad/cammentioning
confidence: 99%