2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of measurements of medial gastrocnemius architectural parameters from ultrasound and diffusion tensor images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
74
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Misalignment of the ultrasound probe with the plane of the fascicles has been shown to result in errors in fascicle length measures (0.4mm per degree of misalignment) using T-US (Bolsterlee et al, 2016). On average, ultrasound images taken of the medial gastrocnemius muscle were found to be misaligned with the fascicles by 5.5° (Bolsterlee et al, 2016; Bolsterlee et al, 2015) indicating an average error of 2.2mm; this error is comparable to the absolute error observed in our phantom measurements (2.2±1.3mm). Our study demonstrates that probe misalignment during EFOV-US does not yield significantly higher error than in T-US.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Misalignment of the ultrasound probe with the plane of the fascicles has been shown to result in errors in fascicle length measures (0.4mm per degree of misalignment) using T-US (Bolsterlee et al, 2016). On average, ultrasound images taken of the medial gastrocnemius muscle were found to be misaligned with the fascicles by 5.5° (Bolsterlee et al, 2016; Bolsterlee et al, 2015) indicating an average error of 2.2mm; this error is comparable to the absolute error observed in our phantom measurements (2.2±1.3mm). Our study demonstrates that probe misalignment during EFOV-US does not yield significantly higher error than in T-US.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Bolsterlee et al . compared the L ft measurements obtained from DT‐MRI with fascicle length measurements from US, and found that they agreed to within a mean difference of 3 mm, indicating good agreement; however, they also observed a relatively poor precision of 10 mm (~20% of the mean fascicle length). Heemskerk et al .…”
Section: Dti Data Analysis For Muscle Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Bolsterlee et al . observed a relative underestimation of US‐measured values of θ compared with DT‐MRI, but only directly under the US probe head; this suggested that tissue deformation associated with the US acquisition may have been the source of disagreement. Heemskerk et al .…”
Section: Dti Data Analysis For Muscle Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course ultrasound provides only a two-dimensional image, therefore the fascicle length will be underestimated in the case that the digitized fascicles do not lie in the image plane. Studies investigating the validity of the ultrasound-based determination of fascicle length reported an acceptable validity for VL and vastus intermedius [42] as well as for GM [43]. In general, the ultrasound-based methodology shows a systematic underestimation of the VL fascicle length with average differences of approximately 6% [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%