2010
DOI: 10.1080/10543401003618991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Measurements by Multiple Methods or Instruments

Abstract: Much work has been done on comparison of one device with another, but the problem of comparing three or more devices is less well known. Most existing work has concentrated on the possibilities of a constant relative bias between the devices, or of different linear relationships with the underlying true value. These two possibilities are placed within a hierarchy of models extending them to settings with multiplicative interaction terms. These additional terms can capture departures such as outliers, variance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonrobust polynomial regression methods have been discussed (Cheng and Van Ness 1999) but lead to rather complicated equations. More pragmatic approaches (Hawkins and Sharma 2010), based on estimating a hierarchy of multiplicative interaction terms, seem to be promising especially in the field of clinical chemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonrobust polynomial regression methods have been discussed (Cheng and Van Ness 1999) but lead to rather complicated equations. More pragmatic approaches (Hawkins and Sharma 2010), based on estimating a hierarchy of multiplicative interaction terms, seem to be promising especially in the field of clinical chemistry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%