2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-357-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of measured brightness temperatures from SMOS with modelled ones from ORCHIDEE and H-TESSEL over the Iberian Peninsula

Abstract: Abstract. L-band radiometry is considered to be one of the most suitable techniques to estimate surface soil moisture (SSM) by means of remote sensing. Brightness temperatures are key in this process, as they are the main input in the retrieval algorithm which yields SSM estimates. The work exposed compares brightness temperatures measured by the SMOS mission to two different sets of modelled ones, over the Iberian Peninsula from 2010 to 2012. The two modelled sets were estimated using a radiative transfer mod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeled soil moisture is generally highly sensitive to the meteorological forcing data used and the land surface model encoded physics [47,48]. This makes comparison of absolute values of observed and modeled SM very challenging, and therefore studies generally focus on the comparison of SM temporal anomalies (e.g., [19,20]), or even in the comparison of observed and modeled brightness temperatures directly (e.g., [49]). The differences found between modeled and observed SM and also among different models support the idea proposed here of leveraging from the natural soil moisture variability captured by satellite observations as a reference for harmonizing SM climate data records so that they become model-independent.…”
Section: Comparison Of Smos Gldas-noah Era5 and In-situ At Target Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeled soil moisture is generally highly sensitive to the meteorological forcing data used and the land surface model encoded physics [47,48]. This makes comparison of absolute values of observed and modeled SM very challenging, and therefore studies generally focus on the comparison of SM temporal anomalies (e.g., [19,20]), or even in the comparison of observed and modeled brightness temperatures directly (e.g., [49]). The differences found between modeled and observed SM and also among different models support the idea proposed here of leveraging from the natural soil moisture variability captured by satellite observations as a reference for harmonizing SM climate data records so that they become model-independent.…”
Section: Comparison Of Smos Gldas-noah Era5 and In-situ At Target Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible land units consist of vegetation, wetlands, lakes, glaciers and urban areas. Vegetated land units have a single set of soil properties but can be populated by several plant functional types (PFTs), again defined by their percentage of coverage with respect to the entire grid cell (Bonan et al, 2002). We have updated the model PFTs with information from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) MCD12Q1 (version 5) land cover products, provided at 500 m resolution in sinusoidal projection and containing a classification of each grid cell describing the dominant plant functional type.…”
Section: Surface Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated top-of-atmosphere signal thereby depends on both static and dynamic ancillary data based on input and output of a specific land surface model, e.g. for SMOS retrievals the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts HTESSEL land surface model (Balsamo et al, 2009). When using a modified or different land surface model, it can be beneficial to directly assimilate the brightness temperatures in order to use consistent auxiliary information for the land surface model and the radiative transfer model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, several approaches have been developed to retrieve land surface soil moisture using satellite measurements at different scales. Nevertheless, validation of these soil moisture products is difficult, mainly due to its dynamic nature, the heterogeneity of the land surface, and the scarce number of available in-situ measurements (Schmugge et al, 1974;Jackson et al, 1984;Entekhabi et al, 1994;Reichle et al, 2004;Jackon et 2012;Albergel et al, 2012;Piles et al, 2014;Gonzáles-Zamora et al, 2016;Gumuzzio et al, 2016;Barella-Ortiz et al, 2017;Sabater et al, 2017;Mousa e Shu, 2020;Portal et al, 2020). SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) mission, launched on November the 2nd 2009 by the European Space Agency (ESA), obtains frequent soil moisture and ocean salinity global maps using microwave radiometry at L band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%