2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of measured and simulated flow through screens: Effects of screen inclination and porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a wind tunnel with screens of different porosity (0.62, 0.52 and 0.4), Teitel et al (2008a) showed that a screen inclined by airflow reduces drag compared to a flow perpendicular to the screen, allowing an increase of 15-30% and 25% in the upper compared with a flat screen. Also, Teitel et al (2009) found that higher speed screens are inclined at 45 ° and decreased to 135 ° tilt. Ali et al (2009) investigated the effect of roof vents on the temperature and coefficient of heat transfer in naturally ventilated facilities.…”
Section: Screens and Ventsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Using a wind tunnel with screens of different porosity (0.62, 0.52 and 0.4), Teitel et al (2008a) showed that a screen inclined by airflow reduces drag compared to a flow perpendicular to the screen, allowing an increase of 15-30% and 25% in the upper compared with a flat screen. Also, Teitel et al (2009) found that higher speed screens are inclined at 45 ° and decreased to 135 ° tilt. Ali et al (2009) investigated the effect of roof vents on the temperature and coefficient of heat transfer in naturally ventilated facilities.…”
Section: Screens and Ventsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Using a wind tunnel with screens of different porosity (0.62, 0.52 and 0.4), Teitel et al (2008a) showed that a screen inclined by airflow reduces drag compared to a flow perpendicular to the screen, allowing an increase of 15 to 30% and 25% in the upper compared with a flat screen. Once more, Teitel et al (2009) found that higher speed screens are inclined at 45° and decreased to 135° tilt.…”
Section: Screens and Ventsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Silt screens, configured as shown, are an example of an engineering application of screen-like structures. The presence of such screen structures in flow has been known to have significant effects on the flow characteristics, in particular the velocity and turbulence distribution (Bailey et al, 2003;Løland, 1993;Schubauer et al, 1950;Teitel et al, 2009). Past studies conducted with wire screens confirmed two important factors that determine the flow patterns about a screen structure: (a) the properties of the screen, including porosity and flexibility; and (b) the geometry of the screen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%