Comparison of maturity models

Khoshgoftar, Mohammad; Osman, Omar

doi:10.1109/iccsit.2009.5234402

Cited by 65 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…P3M3 uses a five-level maturity framework -level 1: awareness; level 2: repeatable; level 3: defined; level 4: managed; level 5: optimised -and seven criteriamanagement control, benefits management, financial management, stakeholder engagement, risk management, organisational governance and resource managementwhich can be assessed under all three modules. Table 1 compares the above-discussed project maturity models in terms of features, focus areas and means of assessment mentioned in Guangshe et al (2008) and Khoshgoftar and Osman (2009). None of the maturity models include or acknowledge sustainability and uncertainty.…”

Section: P3m3 Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measuring project sustainability maturity level - a fuzzy-based approach

Siew¹,

Balatbat

Carmichael

2016

IJSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Traditionally, project management is focused on outcomes such as quality, time and cost, with little consideration for environmental and social issues. While project management maturity has been discussed at length in the literature, there is currently a paucity of research exploring ways to embed sustainability into project management. Being able to measure levels of sustainability attainment in project management will help project owners identify strengths and weaknesses in their current practices. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by: 1) prescribing a set of criteria for assessing project sustainability maturity levels leading to a project sustainability maturity level (PSML) model, and 2) presenting a fuzzy-based approach to measure maturity levels. An example illustrates the various steps involved in the approach. The fuzzy-based approach is seen as appropriate for reflecting the uncertainty in sustainability maturity assessments. The originality of this paper lies in showing how sustainability can be assessed in a progressive manner through maturity levels.

show abstract

Section: P3m3 Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…None of the maturity models include or acknowledge sustainability and uncertainty. Guangshe et al (2008) and Khoshgoftar and Osman (2009) …”

Section: P3m3 Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring project sustainability maturity level - a fuzzy-based approach

Siew¹,

Balatbat

Carmichael

2016

IJSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, maturity models also possesses a set of limitations, from a theoretical perspective in specific (Dakhil and Alshawi, 2014;Jugdev and Thomas, 2002). Existing literature shows that a set of maturity models have been used to assess organisations (Khoshgoftar and Osman, 2009). The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) developed the CMM, which is based on a software development process (SEI, 1993).…”

Section: Maturity Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Over the recent years, an interest over maturity models have increased in such way that maintaining a maturity model supports organisations in becoming more mature (Khoshgoftar and Osman, 2009). Andersen and Jessen (2003) definition of maturity is the quality or state of being mature.…”

Section: Maturity Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of an Integrated BIM and Lean Maturity Model

Mollasalehi¹,

Aboumoemen²,

Rathnayake³

et al. 2018

26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The level of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Lean adoption has been rapidly increased. The benefits of integrating these two approaches have also been identified. However, to achieve the maximum benefits of the interaction of these two approaches, there needs to be assessment tools to analyse their performances collectively. Because understanding and analysing the performances of these approaches would provide value to the entire project in terms of lessons learned, more value generation, and continuous improvements. Therefore, this paper aims to propose an integrated BIM and Lean Maturity Model based on reviewing the literature around current maturity models.This paper proposes an Integrated BIM and Lean Maturity Model named "IDEAL" which could serve as a basis in terms of assessing the performances of the projects implementing BIM and Lean together.

show abstract

“…The purpose of using any maturity model is always to find improvements by assessing existing practices of project management. The maturity model differs with each other in terms of their characteristics, factors and structures to achieve desired purpose [31], that concluded from their comparison that Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) stands best because OPM3 refers to PMBOK that is a worldwide acceptable standard, OPM3 publisher PMI has status of being most popular around the world for project management, covers strategic management, covers project, program and portfolio management aspects, follows continuous approach compared to other maturity models which follow staged approach, date of issue shows that it is not old, provides tools for selfassessment and external assessment of project management maturity, identifies strength and weakness and suggest alternatives to improve, provides path to prioritize improvements, simple and easily understandable, the assessment has low cost, industry independence and can be applied to any industrial sector. OPM3 self-assessment questionnaire contains 151 questions [32] and 42 questions are related with quality management maturity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment Model of Contractor Quality Management Maturity

Permatasari

Adi

Wiguna

2017

IJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstractOne of the most important parts of a project management is the quality management. While it is absolutely necessary to conduct a thorough research on the maturity of quality management in construction companies, especially contractors so that construction companies know at what level of their company quality, this has an effect on building customer perceptions of their companies and the business of the company itself to continue to grow to be able to reach the highest maturity level. This paper aims to propose an assessment model of contractor quality management maturity (

show abstract

Comparison of maturity models

Cited by 65 publications

References 9 publications

Measuring project sustainability maturity level - a fuzzy-based approach

Measuring project sustainability maturity level - a fuzzy-based approach

Development of an Integrated BIM and Lean Maturity Model

Assessment Model of Contractor Quality Management Maturity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About