2020
DOI: 10.5603/gp.a2020.0132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of maternal-neonatal results of vaginal birth after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate maternal-neonatal results in women who underwent vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD). Material and methods: In a two-year retrospective cohort analysis, 423 patients with a history of prior cesarean section, singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation and gestational age of 37-41 weeks were investigated. The maternal and perinatal outcomes of 195 patients desiring VBAC and undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) attempt and 228 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies had shown a positive correlation between perineal lacerations and operative vaginal deliveries, but most of these studies concentrated on third-and fourth-degree perineal tears [2,9,18,20]. Our study included perineal lacerations from rst-to fourth-degree, and the result was consistent with the observation reported elsewhere, [9] showing a higher risk of spontaneous perineal tears in VBAC women and VBAC women without cervical dilation compared to the primipara control group.…”
Section: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Of The Study Groupssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies had shown a positive correlation between perineal lacerations and operative vaginal deliveries, but most of these studies concentrated on third-and fourth-degree perineal tears [2,9,18,20]. Our study included perineal lacerations from rst-to fourth-degree, and the result was consistent with the observation reported elsewhere, [9] showing a higher risk of spontaneous perineal tears in VBAC women and VBAC women without cervical dilation compared to the primipara control group.…”
Section: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Of The Study Groupssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In a recent study by İzbudak 2021, [ 35 ] it was observed that certain factors have an impact on the success of TOLAC including maternal age, birth weight, the number of previous vaginal deliveries, and the presence of spontaneous onset of active-phase labor. Additionally, maternal pelvis and fetal size were found to be significant factors associated with TOLAC success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a thorough assessment of the remaining 13 studies, they were included in the final analysis. [21,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Figure 1 described the detailed search process.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies had shown a positive correlation between perineal lacerations and assisted vaginal birth, but most of these studies concentrated on third- and fourth-degree perineal tears [ 3 , 11 , 20 , 21 ]. Our study included perineal lacerations from first- to fourth-degree, and the result was consistent with the observation reported elsewhere [ 11 ], showing a higher risk of spontaneous perineal tears in women who had a VBAC, especially in those without cervical dilation when compared to the primipara control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%