2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10127-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of manual and artificial intelligence based quantification of myocardial strain by feature tracking—a cardiovascular MR study in health and disease

Jan Gröschel,
Johanna Kuhnt,
Darian Viezzer
et al.

Abstract: Objectives The analysis of myocardial deformation using feature tracking in cardiovascular MR allows for the assessment of global and segmental strain values. The aim of this study was to compare strain values derived from artificial intelligence (AI)–based contours with manually derived strain values in healthy volunteers and patients with cardiac pathologies. Materials and methods A cohort of 136 subjects (60 healthy volunteers and 76 patients; of those … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further validations with larger cohorts and comparison with other software and modalities are of value. Additionally, the recent integration of artificial intelligence in CMR strain measurement [ 39 ] suggests a similar potential for CT strain analysis. This approach could reduce interobserver variability and streamline the process, enhancing the practicality of CT strain in clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further validations with larger cohorts and comparison with other software and modalities are of value. Additionally, the recent integration of artificial intelligence in CMR strain measurement [ 39 ] suggests a similar potential for CT strain analysis. This approach could reduce interobserver variability and streamline the process, enhancing the practicality of CT strain in clinical use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left atrial function was assessed biplanar using the two- and four- chamber views. Strain analysis was carried out with retrospective feature tracking on cine images as reported recently ( 21 ). Global values for longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain are reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results, the AI-derived strain values performed well in healthy volunteer images and most patient groups with an overestimation of radial strain and underestimation of circumferential and longitudinal strain. The above research demonstrated that utilizing AI-generated contours for feature tracking and strain analysis in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) produces results that are on par with manual segmentations [58]. It is crucial to exercise caution when assessing cases of left ventricle hypertrophy, particularly in patients with aortic stenosis, regardless of whether manual or AI-generated contours are employed.…”
Section: Cardiac Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%