2004
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.203.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Magnetoencephalographic Spikes with and without Concurrent Electroencephalographic Spikes in Extratemporal Epilepsy

Abstract: Interictal spikes in patients with epilepsy may be detected by either electroencephalography (EEG) (E-spikes) or magnetoencephalography (MEG) (M-spikes), or both MEG and EEG (E/M-spikes). Localization and amplitude were compared between E/M-spikes and M-spikes in 7 adult patients with extratemporal epilepsy to evaluate the clinical significance of MEG spikes. MEG and EEG were simultaneously measured using a helmet-shaped MEG system with planar-type gradiometers and scalp electrodes of the international 10-20 s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the fraction of the commonly detected interictal spikes in both EEG and MEG was comparable to previous studies [i.e., here 44 vs. 41% in Ramantani et al (2006) and 51.1% in Park et al (2004)]. For source localizations to interictal epileptiform activity, it is recommended to perform the analysis during the upslope of the spike since source propagation can already occur during this interval (Alarcon et al, 1994; Lantz et al, 2003; Ray et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our study, the fraction of the commonly detected interictal spikes in both EEG and MEG was comparable to previous studies [i.e., here 44 vs. 41% in Ramantani et al (2006) and 51.1% in Park et al (2004)]. For source localizations to interictal epileptiform activity, it is recommended to perform the analysis during the upslope of the spike since source propagation can already occur during this interval (Alarcon et al, 1994; Lantz et al, 2003; Ray et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, presumably MEG detected the tangential current produced by the insular cortex possibly distorted by the structural lesion (Park et al 2002). Previously, M-spikes were considered to have similar localization to E/M-spikes in patients with TLE or extratemporal epilepsy (Park et al 2002(Park et al , 2004. However, the present findings in our Patient 1 suggest that the M-spikes may be earlier and more localized, and so may provide important localization information about the epileptic origin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The ECDs of M-spikes may be scattered due to poor signal-to-noise ratios, and the orientation could be random if such restricted focal activity has multiple sources around the insular lesion. Scalp EEG cannot detect M-spike activity because the amplitude is too small to overcome the background brain noise resulting from the poor spatial resolution of scalp EEG (Park et al 2004). The larger ECD moments of the E/M-spikes may reflect more extended sources compared to the M-spikes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Ramantani et al (2006), more spikes were detected in the MEG compared with the simultaneously recorded EEG in 14 patients. A similar argumentation was put forward earlier by Park et al (2004). A similar argumentation was put forward earlier by Park et al (2004).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%