2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based and Conventional Measurements for Proton Beam Therapy of Uveal Melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3DT1gd and 3DT2-weighted images, both with acquisition voxel size of 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 mm 3 , were acquired to an earlier described protocol [15] , [16] . Ultrasound images were obtained by an ocular oncologist [25] . Details on image acquisition are further described in the Supplementary Materials .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3DT1gd and 3DT2-weighted images, both with acquisition voxel size of 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 mm 3 , were acquired to an earlier described protocol [15] , [16] . Ultrasound images were obtained by an ocular oncologist [25] . Details on image acquisition are further described in the Supplementary Materials .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess how these automatic 3D measurements relate to the currently used manual assessments, the prominence and LBD were measured manually on the T1gd-weighted images. For the prominence, the clinical measurement was used, measured perpendicular to the sclera [25] . For the LBD, the measurements were repeated on the delineated tumour contour, to avoid the confounding effect of a different tumour boundary interpretation [27] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations