2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-018-0291-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of macronutrient content in human milk measured by mid-infrared human milk analyzer and reference methods

Abstract: Objective The study aims at evaluating mid-infrared human milk analyzer (HMA) accuracy and precision, in human milk (HM). Study design Röse-Gottlieb, high-performance anion exchange chromatography-pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD), Kjeldahl and amino acid analysis (AA) were selected as references for total fat, lactose and total protein determination. Results No significant difference was observed in lactose content between HMA and HP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total lipids was measured by MIRIS ® HMA as previously described by Giuffrida et al [23] and results are listed in Table 2. Total lipids content increased from colostrum (2.4 and 1.7 g/100 mL preterm and term HM, respectively) to mature milk (3.1 and 3.6 g/100 mL in preterm and term HM, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total lipids was measured by MIRIS ® HMA as previously described by Giuffrida et al [23] and results are listed in Table 2. Total lipids content increased from colostrum (2.4 and 1.7 g/100 mL preterm and term HM, respectively) to mature milk (3.1 and 3.6 g/100 mL in preterm and term HM, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has some limitations to consider: (i) as mentioned above, the method of sampling (first milk of the morning rather than pooled over 24 h) could have increased the measured variations, especially for lipids; (ii) variations in milk volumes, that may have also contributed to the important variability observed, were not recorded and thus could not be taken into account; (iii) the method of measuring macronutrients (MIRIS ©) is a method whose reliability is open to criticism [46]. We attempted to enhance its accuracy through validation methods and protein correction strategy [31]; (iv) finally, the small number of patients in each group limited the power of the study, and allowed only a limited number of associated factors to be analyzed. However, the influence of other factors, such as intrauterine growth restriction, twinning, antenatal steroids, smoking, and maternal comorbidities, for example, also deserves to be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a MIRIS measure validation process that had been previously published [31]. As in other literature reports, this validation showed that the MIRIS was not accurate enough for the measurement of total protein in human milk as compared with the Kjeldahl reference method (AOAC International, method number 991.22), while no differences were observed for fat and carbohydrate content as compared with the corresponding reference methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several investigators have evaluated the MIRIS HMA, with variable and conflicting results in precision and accuracy compared with reference biochemical macronutrient determination techniques (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) . Many studies have demonstrated good precision with the MIRIS HMA in fat and protein but not in lactose determination (25,26,28) ; this may be due to the presence of oligosaccharides in significant numbers in human milk which cannot be differentiated from lactose by the IR technology (30,31) .…”
Section: Milk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%