2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying aphasic and non-aphasic speakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five attributes were then processed by Weka (a machine learning based software). [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In the present study, to achieve the optimization of the results previously found we focused in an ECG analysis using wavelet transforms, statistical information and the original signal processed by LWL, J48, ADTree and RandomForest. These algorithms are inserted in Weka and have already been used in signal processing at different context/applications, as an open source software Weka has a high potential in many other applicantions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five attributes were then processed by Weka (a machine learning based software). [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In the present study, to achieve the optimization of the results previously found we focused in an ECG analysis using wavelet transforms, statistical information and the original signal processed by LWL, J48, ADTree and RandomForest. These algorithms are inserted in Weka and have already been used in signal processing at different context/applications, as an open source software Weka has a high potential in many other applicantions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%