2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of machine learning algorithms for forest parameter estimations and application for forest quality assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RFs were more consistent in responding to small perturbations in the data, and the randomness in the RFs reduces overfitting during model training [71]. This result was consistent with some other studies that showed that RF and SVR have great potential for forest biomass estimation with remote-sensing techniques [41,44,46,47]. Additionally, the main advantage of the RF algorithm was to identify important predictor variables and model the relationship between them and the AGC.…”
Section: Model Performance Of the Mlassupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The RFs were more consistent in responding to small perturbations in the data, and the randomness in the RFs reduces overfitting during model training [71]. This result was consistent with some other studies that showed that RF and SVR have great potential for forest biomass estimation with remote-sensing techniques [41,44,46,47]. Additionally, the main advantage of the RF algorithm was to identify important predictor variables and model the relationship between them and the AGC.…”
Section: Model Performance Of the Mlassupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The MLAs, which demonstrated great potential to estimate forest parameters, especially AGB and AGC, can overcome the multicollinearity problem and they do not make assumptions about the nature of the data distribution [44]. The comparison of the MLAs showed that RFs had better performance in AGC estimation than SVR and ANN in this study ( Table 4).…”
Section: Model Performance Of the Mlasmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Random forest (RF) is a machine learning algorithm based on decision trees that has been used extensively for forest AGB mapping using remote sensing data in the last two decades. RF provides higher accuracy than comparative machine learning methods and conventional statistical regressions because RF is less sensitive to noise in the training samples (Hoover et al 2018;Powell et al 2010;Zhao et al 2019). However, a major shortcoming of RF is that it ignores the spatial autocorrelation of the data when mapping the feature distribution (Chen et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study provides a methodology on forest condition assessment at regional scales, as well as the up-to-date information for the forest ecosystem in the CMNNR. usually contains indicators of community structure and productivity [6][7][8]. The sub-compartment measurements of the National Forest Inventory in China contain the information about structure, including canopy closure, stand density and forest age, and function, including stand volume and soil condition [9,10].The explicit mapping of spatial variations of forest structure and function parameters has been an essential effort in ecological analysis [11][12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%