2012
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Lower Body Specific Resistance Training on the Hamstring to Quadriceps Strength Ratios in Men and Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study showed no significant differences in elbow flexors strength gains between college-aged men and women after 10 weeks of RT. Our results are in agreement with previous studies of lower body strength gains between sexes in response to the same RT protocol ( Ivey et al, 2000 ; Galvao et al, 2006 ; Dorgo et al, 2012 ). Similar results were found for Abe et al (2000) , who evaluated the strength gains of upper and lower body by one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests (bench press and leg extension, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the present study showed no significant differences in elbow flexors strength gains between college-aged men and women after 10 weeks of RT. Our results are in agreement with previous studies of lower body strength gains between sexes in response to the same RT protocol ( Ivey et al, 2000 ; Galvao et al, 2006 ; Dorgo et al, 2012 ). Similar results were found for Abe et al (2000) , who evaluated the strength gains of upper and lower body by one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests (bench press and leg extension, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies reported that men and women performing the same RT regimen did not differ in strength gains, both absolute and relative, for the lower limbs ( Ivey et al, 2000 ; Galvao et al, 2006 ; Dorgo et al, 2012 ). Fisher et al (2014) have recently reported the strength gains of male and female trainees from a private RT facility for both upper and lower body exercises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…HLRT (i.e., resistance training using exercise loads ∼80%–85% 1 repetition maximum) consistently has been reported to result in marked gains in maximal ECC muscle strength. 5 , 12 , 26 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 Moreover, resistance training using maximal ECC muscle contractions or coupled ECC–CONC contractions (i.e., involving stretch–shortening cycle muscle actions) seems to evoke greater gains in maximal ECC muscle strength than CONC training alone. 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 42 , 44 In contrast, maximal ECC muscle strength seems to remain unaffected in response to low-load resistance training, 5 , 33 , 41 , 45 suggesting that the exertion of high muscle forces during training is a key stimulus to inducing adaptive changes in maximal ECC muscle strength.…”
Section: Mechanical Muscle Function During Ecc Muscle Actions Of Maximentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, as co-activation of the hamstrings will reduce ACL loading (28,33), exercises with higher HQ activation ratios may be preferred during the early rehabilitation after ACL injury or surgery. It has been suggested that HQ strength ratios should be at least 0.6 to prevent ACL and hamstrings injuries (16,23). Choosing exercises with high HQ activation ratios may prevent strength imbalances, and thus injury, to occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%