2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines

Abstract: A Double Multiple Streamtube model, a free-wake vortex model (both widely used for vertical axis wind turbine design) and RANS CFD simulations are used in this work to predict the performance of the 17m Vertical Axis Wind Turbine, field tested by Sandia National Laboratories. The three-dimensional, full scale calculations are compared with the experiments in terms of power coefficient, power and instantaneous turbine torque to assess the validity of each model. Additionally, the two aerodynamic models and RANS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its simplicity and lack of certain flow physics, the DMST model proved reliable in its predictions of the mean power coefficient of the VAWT, for the tested range of parameters. This could be in part due to the fact that our tested tip speed ratios 250 are rather low, while DMST inaccuracies tend to emerge at high tip speed ratios where friction and wake effects are more significant (Delafin et al, 2017). Data availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its simplicity and lack of certain flow physics, the DMST model proved reliable in its predictions of the mean power coefficient of the VAWT, for the tested range of parameters. This could be in part due to the fact that our tested tip speed ratios 250 are rather low, while DMST inaccuracies tend to emerge at high tip speed ratios where friction and wake effects are more significant (Delafin et al, 2017). Data availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulent features of the flow are modelled by the transition shear stress transport model (transition SST) of Menter [41,42] which includes the effects of laminar to turbulent transition of the boundary layer on the turbine performance. This model has been employed previously in the simulation of the flow around vertical turbines [25,27,40,43] showing good comparison with experiments. Further details about the advantages of using this turbulence model on the CFWT configuration can be found in [3,27].…”
Section: Turbine Configuration and Simulation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The numerical models can be categorised into the main types, stream-tube, vortex method and CFD modelling. The study of Delafin et al [40] compared the RANS CFD modelling method with other two low order aerodynamic models (double multiple streamtube model and free-wake vortex mode) based on the prediction of VAWT's performance, examined by Sandia National Laboratories. The models were assessed based on the prediction of the power coefficient, power, thrust, lateral force and instantaneous turbine torque.…”
Section: Micro-small Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7. Error of the predicted power by CFD, stream-tube, vortex methods from the experiments at several tip speed ratios (TSR) [40].…”
Section: Micro-small Scalementioning
confidence: 99%