2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of low, medium and high fidelity numerical methods for unsteady aerodynamics and nonlinear aeroelasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have found that the flat-vortex-sheet approximation is reasonable when bodies undergo small-to-moderate deflections (Izraelevitz, Zhu & Triantafyllou 2017; Fernandez-Escudero et al. 2019). The approximation worsens at larger membrane deflections, where the wake deflection would become similarly large and other inviscid approximations (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have found that the flat-vortex-sheet approximation is reasonable when bodies undergo small-to-moderate deflections (Izraelevitz, Zhu & Triantafyllou 2017; Fernandez-Escudero et al. 2019). The approximation worsens at larger membrane deflections, where the wake deflection would become similarly large and other inviscid approximations (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theodorson unsteady aerodynamics is a method of calculating aerodynamic loads using two-dimensional oscillating airfoils. Claudia 13 compared the unsteady vortex lattice, Euler method, and Reynolds averaged Naiver-Stokes method using Theodorsen theory to study the critical flutter velocity and limit cycle oscillation of two-dimensional airfoils under nonlinear conditions. It was pointed out that low fidelity methods can achieve the same phenomenon and reduce calculation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%