2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of low-level polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediment revealed by Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and pressurized liquid extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained for the material reference were comparable to results which have been published using Soxhlet extraction for determining HA and PAH in river sediment. 26,27 In addition, it was used a certified reference material to validate the method. The test was performed only for PAH, because there is no certified reference material for AH.…”
Section: Parameters Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained for the material reference were comparable to results which have been published using Soxhlet extraction for determining HA and PAH in river sediment. 26,27 In addition, it was used a certified reference material to validate the method. The test was performed only for PAH, because there is no certified reference material for AH.…”
Section: Parameters Of Meritmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution was then transferred to a 1cm quartz cuvette and the absorbance was read at 446nm. The method was applied according to the PORIM Test Method, [6]. The carotene content was denoted as ppm beta-carotene by using the following formula:…”
Section: Concentration Of Beta Carotenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 On the other hand, after a previous study, 19 it was confirmed that a harsher condition (190˚C, 20 MPa) can introduce higher analytical results attributed to more effective extraction of native PAHs using the same sediment sample (+22% for Phe, +12% for Flu, +7% for BaA, +14% for BaP, and +16% for BghiP; details will be shown in elsewhere), although PLE (150˚C, 15 MPa) can introduce higher analytical results relative to other extraction techniques, such as Soxhlet and microwave-assisted extractions. 18 Thus, the PLE condition (190˚C, 20 MPa) was used in this study, since the most effective condition of PLE should be applied to not only the samples, but also the examination of biases during the PLE process.…”
Section: Effect Of the Ple Process On Native Pah/d-pah Ratios In The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because PLE not only has at least as good an extraction efficiency as Soxhlet extraction, but is also faster and consumes less solvent, [15][16][17][18] it is widely used for routine work. On the other hand, native PAHs and D-PAHs show different behaviors during the PLE process of samples at ng g -1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%