2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23063312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Low-Cost 5G Electromagnetic Field Sensors

Abstract: This paper compares different low-cost sensors that can measure (5G) RF-EMF exposure. The sensors are either commercially available (off-the-shelf Software Defined Radio (SDR) Adalm Pluto) or constructed by a research institution (i.e., imec-WAVES, Ghent University and Smart Sensor Systems research group (S³R), The Hague University of Applied Sciences). Both in-lab (GTEM cell) and in-situ measurements have been performed for this comparison. The in-lab measurements tested the linearity and sensitivity, which c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost of the equipment (thousands of Euros per device) is a very important limiting factor for both fixed measurements and personal exposure meters. This has led to the search for low-cost solutions for the measurement of the new 5G mobile networks [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of the equipment (thousands of Euros per device) is a very important limiting factor for both fixed measurements and personal exposure meters. This has led to the search for low-cost solutions for the measurement of the new 5G mobile networks [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of exposimetric portable sensors for evaluating electromagnetic pollution at an individual level is an emerging and evolving area of research. Currently, the research is focused on the development of narrow-band sensors [18]. Most restricted-capability solutions have limitations concerning frequency bandwidths and lack correlation between the measured field data and the geographic position of the measurements [19,20] or are limited to indoor environments [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%