2021
DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.07.767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of loose silk and tightenable polypropylene seton placement in treatment of complex anal fistula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 A study compared loose silk Seton and a cutting Seton made from prolene, wherein they found that though little difference occurred in terms of recurrence and fecal continence, there was far more pain experienced with the prolene seton. 16 The study where surgical glove strip was used as a seton material found 24.1% incontinence rates however, of these only 5.4% were liquid stool, the rest were all incontinence to flatus. 17 Another study undertook silicone based seton that was tightly tied to the muscle complex, here they found 25% incontinence rates which is comparable to some other studies that used cutting setons alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15 A study compared loose silk Seton and a cutting Seton made from prolene, wherein they found that though little difference occurred in terms of recurrence and fecal continence, there was far more pain experienced with the prolene seton. 16 The study where surgical glove strip was used as a seton material found 24.1% incontinence rates however, of these only 5.4% were liquid stool, the rest were all incontinence to flatus. 17 Another study undertook silicone based seton that was tightly tied to the muscle complex, here they found 25% incontinence rates which is comparable to some other studies that used cutting setons alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%