COMMENT & RESPONSEIn Reply We thank Balentine for his interest and comments regarding our recent publication. 1 The author raised some valuable points of discussion regarding the power calculation in our work.We quite agree that the post hoc power analysis may be misleading. Because of the overall low recurrence and mortality of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), even in our study setting of PTC with ipsilateral clinical lateral neck metastasis (cN1b) with a recurrence rate of approximately 20%, 2 a prohibitively large sample size would be required for the statistical power to demonstrate significant differences in outcomes. So far, prospective randomized clinical trials on the management of cN1b PTC have not been done. 3,4 Therefore, we conducted this retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching to minimize the influence of related factors. Owing to the retrospective nature of these data, the sample size of the study cannot be calculated in advance but instead reflects the number of patients meeting eligibility criteria. The post hoc analysis was used to examine the ability to find survival differences among the sample in our study.Balentine noted that the reason for censoring was not reported. As he says, it is inevitable that there was a considerable proportion of loss due to nonadministrative censoring in observational study. In our study, patients lost to follow-up for whom we did not have not recurrence data during the study period were defined as censored, which was about 40%. Our sample size goal was not met, although it was close to the necessary size to detect a 5% difference, and this is the largest sample of patients with unilateral cN1b PTC that we have known up to now. Before we ran the Cox regression model, the assumption of proportional hazard was checked using a Schoenfeld residual test, and variables having a P value >.05 were considered to fulfill the assumption. The proportional hazard assumption was checked, and no violation was found (eg, extent of surgery, P = .16).We agree with Balentine that a larger sample size is needed to detect meaningful differences in outcome between lobectomy and total thyroidectomy, but given the paucity of prospective data and the lack of a large sample, we feel this study provides important data for lobectomy use in patients with unilateral cN1b PTC that future clinical trials can explore.