2016
DOI: 10.1111/evj.12582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of lipopolysaccharides and soluble CD14 measurement between clinically endotoxaemic and nonendotoxaemic horses

Abstract: Further investigation is warranted to assess the utility of sCD14 measurement as a clinically useful biomarker to identify endotoxaemia in horses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As plasma markers of endotoxaemia, the incidence of sCD14 exceeding the established reference range and TNFα exceeding zero were recorded and compared (Table ) . There were no significant differences in TNFα levels between the two groups at any time period (Fig a, P = 0.50) or in the proportion of horses with detectable plasma TNFα in each group (Fig b, P = 0.40).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As plasma markers of endotoxaemia, the incidence of sCD14 exceeding the established reference range and TNFα exceeding zero were recorded and compared (Table ) . There were no significant differences in TNFα levels between the two groups at any time period (Fig a, P = 0.50) or in the proportion of horses with detectable plasma TNFα in each group (Fig b, P = 0.40).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the difference and variance in plasma sCD14 measurements in clinical SISO cases with or without clinical signs of endotoxaemia (302.6 AE 465.0 [s.d.] ng/mL, an unpublished data set from Fogle et al [7]), a statistical power of 0.8 and an a of 0.05, enrolment of 76 horses (n = 38 in each treatment group) was initially considered. However, during interim analysis, a statistically significant difference in sCD14 measurements was identified following analysis of 56 enrolled horses after 2 years, and the study was concluded.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…interleukin-6 (IL-6), serum amyloid A (SAA), soluble CD14 (sCD14) and procalcitonin (34,35). Measurement of sCD14 provided contrasting results: no signi cant differences in concentration were recorded among time in experimental settings (34), while sCD14 was higher in in spontaneous clinically endotoxemic than nonendotoxemic horses, showing however no correlation with LPS concentration (36). In many studies involving different types of experimentally induced endotoxemia in horses, cytokine expression was rapidly upregulated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These clinical benefits were not apparent in the results [1]. In fact the only major statistically significant finding was related to a marker considered a 'poor predictor of clinical endotoxaemia' according to a previous study by coauthors [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%