2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13098-023-01056-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of lipid accumulation product and visceral adiposity index with traditional obesity indices in early-onset type 2 diabetes prediction: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of two novel obesity indices, lipid accumulation product (LAP) and visceral adiposity index (VAI), with traditional obesity indices in predicting early-onset type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods In this cross-sectional study, a total of 744 participants, including 605 patients newly diagnosed with T2DM and 139 non-diabetic control subjects, were enrolled from a tertiary care hospital in Tia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LAP has emerged as a promising anthropometric index for assessing cardiometabolic risk ( 31 , 34 ). Evidence showed that LAP serves as a predictor of diabetes risk in both Japanese and Chinese populations, outperforming traditional obesity indicators ( 35 , 36 ). A population-based prospective cohort study conducted in China revealed that individuals in the high LAP group had a 1.67 times higher risk of stroke compared to those in the low LAP group ( 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LAP has emerged as a promising anthropometric index for assessing cardiometabolic risk ( 31 , 34 ). Evidence showed that LAP serves as a predictor of diabetes risk in both Japanese and Chinese populations, outperforming traditional obesity indicators ( 35 , 36 ). A population-based prospective cohort study conducted in China revealed that individuals in the high LAP group had a 1.67 times higher risk of stroke compared to those in the low LAP group ( 37 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%