2009
DOI: 10.1364/oe.17.008756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of light scattering models for diffuse optical tomography

Abstract: We reconstruct images of the absorption and the scattering coefficients for diffuse optical tomography using five different models for light propagation in tissues: (1) the radiative transport equation, (2) the delta-Eddington approximation, (3) the Fokker-Planck approximation, (4) the Fokker-Planck-Eddington approximation and (5) the generalized Fokker-Planck-Eddington approximation. The last four models listed are approximations of the radiative transport equation that take into account forward-peaked scatte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several studies on the asymptotic behavior of (7.1) with forward-peaked scattering leading to the Fokker-Planck approximation [35] and its generalizations [37,29]. Solving the radiative transfer equation (7.1) with these approximate scattering operators has led to useful physical insight [25,26,16]. However, for most scattering models used for applications, the Fokker-Planck approximation is inaccurate.…”
Section: Extension To Forward-peaked Scattering In Radiative Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies on the asymptotic behavior of (7.1) with forward-peaked scattering leading to the Fokker-Planck approximation [35] and its generalizations [37,29]. Solving the radiative transfer equation (7.1) with these approximate scattering operators has led to useful physical insight [25,26,16]. However, for most scattering models used for applications, the Fokker-Planck approximation is inaccurate.…”
Section: Extension To Forward-peaked Scattering In Radiative Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models were developed describing light transport inside tissue employing finite element methods (FEM) or Monte Carlo simulations for image reconstruction to determine differences in absorption and scattering coefficients [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The implementation of those methods is strongly simplified due to recent developments in software toolboxes like TOAST 1 or NIRFAST² offering a broad variety of adjustable parameters [19].…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Inner Tissue Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we have considered M discrete directions defined as h m ¼ ðm À 1ÞDh with Dh ¼ 2p=M, and the weights have been chosen to be [9,25] …”
Section: Directional Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%