2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: A prospective, randomized study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Kimura et al demonstrated the effectiveness of CF monitoring during PV isolation in paroxysmal AF. 21 A TOCCATA study reported that AF recurrence was universally noted when average CF was <10 g and maintenance of sinus rhythm was best achieved when average CF was >20 g. 20 We showed that PV isolation done with CF of 10-20 g significantly reduced AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF compared with the procedure without CF monitoring. 22 A TOCCASTAR study compared the outcomes of CF-vs. non-CF-guided catheter ablation in a prospective, randomized study, and demonstrated that when optimal CF (≥90% ablations with CF ≥10 g) was obtained, CF-guided ablation was associated with improved effectiveness compared with non-CF-guided ablation.…”
Section: Endpoint Of Pvimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…20 Kimura et al demonstrated the effectiveness of CF monitoring during PV isolation in paroxysmal AF. 21 A TOCCATA study reported that AF recurrence was universally noted when average CF was <10 g and maintenance of sinus rhythm was best achieved when average CF was >20 g. 20 We showed that PV isolation done with CF of 10-20 g significantly reduced AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF compared with the procedure without CF monitoring. 22 A TOCCASTAR study compared the outcomes of CF-vs. non-CF-guided catheter ablation in a prospective, randomized study, and demonstrated that when optimal CF (≥90% ablations with CF ≥10 g) was obtained, CF-guided ablation was associated with improved effectiveness compared with non-CF-guided ablation.…”
Section: Endpoint Of Pvimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…3-5 Contact force (CF) monitoring of the ablation catheter might help achieve more durable lesions and substantially improve procedural outcomes. 6 A recent randomized, multicenter study, however, showed that CF data availability was associated with reduced acute PV reconnections but not improved 1-year success rates, procedure and fluoroscopy times, or complication rates. 7 The failure of CF monitoring to improve clinical outcome of AF ablation might be due to a lack of information on the catheter stability as well as the precise location of ablated lesions, and subsequent heterogeneous ablation intensity.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These studies have shown that some operators are able to estimate CF with a high degree of accuracy when CF information is not available and may explain why, when the CF information was available, none of these studies demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in long-term outcomes. [16][17][18] Despite the lack of superiority demonstrated by randomised studies, some experts consider their personal experience with CF catheters to be so favourable they would "consider it almost unethical to perform an AF RF ablation with a non-CF-sensing catheter". 19 It is possible that the failure to demonstrate unequivocal benefit can be explained by study design, variability in the catheter and mapping systems used and the absence of target guidelines at the procedural outset.…”
Section: Clinical Impact Of Contact Force Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%