2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of left ventricular with right ventricular rapid pacing on tamponade during TAVI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The examinations confirmed the absence of regional wall motion abnormality and intact coronary flow, allowing the surgeons to rule out mitral valve regurgitation resulting from papillary muscle ischemia. 3 It was also confirmed that acute severe mitral valve regurgitation was related to the LV pacing wire because the regurgitation improved immediately after the pacing wire was retrieved, and stable blood pressure was restored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The examinations confirmed the absence of regional wall motion abnormality and intact coronary flow, allowing the surgeons to rule out mitral valve regurgitation resulting from papillary muscle ischemia. 3 It was also confirmed that acute severe mitral valve regurgitation was related to the LV pacing wire because the regurgitation improved immediately after the pacing wire was retrieved, and stable blood pressure was restored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As part of this trend, LV rapid pacing is being implemented for transcatheter heart valve deployment because some studies suggest that it is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective compared with traditional right heart pacing and may represent a step forward in the overall simplification of TAVR procedures. 3 , 4 Apprehensions persist, however, regarding the safety of LV pacing, especially concerning potential issues such as loss of contact leading, the risk of embolization, and the possible increased risk of LV free-wall rupture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 Where some operators may prefer IJ venous access for more secure RV lead placement, others may prefer to persist with femoral placement of the pacing wire to ensure shorter procedure times—and only consider IJ pacing wire placement if there is confirmed conduction disturbance. Procedural time has been shown to be shortened by 7-13 ​minutes when RV pacing is not utilized 9 , 14 , 15 and total cost per-patient at 30 days is significantly reduced, driven by materials and cath lab time spared. 14 These combined benefits are important for cath lab efficiencies, budgets, patient access, and productivity as TAVR volumes continue to rise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All cases were undertaken with conscious sedation and transthoracic ultrasound monitoring 5 . In all cases valvuloplasty and transcatheter heart valve (THV) deployment were undertaken with rapid pacing via the 0.035″ delivery catheter wire 6 . Activated clotting time (ACT) was maintained at 250–300 s throughout the procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%