2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00147.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of leaf construction costs in woody species with differing leaf life‐spans in contrasting ecosystems

Abstract: Summary• The construction costs ( CC ) are reported of leaves from 162 wild woody species from 14 contrasting environments (desert to rain forest) and with different leaf life-spans.• Calorimetric methods were used to estimate the CC of deciduous, semideciduous and evergreen leaves.• Leaf CC showed a wide range (78%) between species, and deciduous species showed a slightly lower CC (6%) than both semideciduous and evergreen species. Mean leaf CC differed between ecosystems, with the highest and lowest CC in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
153
5
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
16
153
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The disproportionate PW relative to leaf area for leaves of larger M^ and the consequently higher petiole flexural rigidity would contribute greater support stability given that the laminar center of mass could be displaced over larger petiolar second moment of area. Such investment in greater safety is consistent with the investment in greater construction cost for leaves of higher M^, and their generally longer life spans (Villar and Merino 2001;Wright et al 2004).…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The disproportionate PW relative to leaf area for leaves of larger M^ and the consequently higher petiole flexural rigidity would contribute greater support stability given that the laminar center of mass could be displaced over larger petiolar second moment of area. Such investment in greater safety is consistent with the investment in greater construction cost for leaves of higher M^, and their generally longer life spans (Villar and Merino 2001;Wright et al 2004).…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Building high-LMA leaves needs more investment per unit leaf area. Construction cost per unit leaf mass varies relatively little between species: leaves with high protein content (typically low-LMA leaves) tend to have low concentrations of other expensive compounds such as lipids or lignin, and high concentrations of cheap constituents such as minerals 41 . Leaf traits associated with high LMA (for example, thick leaf blade; small, thick-walled cells) have been interpreted as adaptations that allow continued leaf function (or at least postpone leaf death) under very dry conditions, at least in evergreen species.…”
Section: Climate Influence On Leaf Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the leaf area index (LAI) of the tower footprint calculated using the initial model's allometric parameterization was 6.5, substantially higher than the LAI of 4 measured in the tower footprint. This discrepancy was corrected by modifying the leaf area-DBH relationships for early and midsuccessional hardwoods (Table 3) to match the empirical allometry estimates of Ter-Mikaelian and Korzukhin [1997] and Villar and Merino [2001]. These yield an LAI of 4.05 for the tower footprint, closely matching the observed LAI.…”
Section: Model Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%