1999
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/9/2/310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of lateral and vertical switches for application as microrelays

Abstract: This paper discusses the suitability of lateral and vertical switches for use as micorelays. These two types of switch are fabricated and tested and the advantages and disadvantages are outlined. The lateral motion switch consists of a single-crystalline silicon cantilever beam, which is made by a deep silicon etching process. Therefore the switch provides a high stiffness in the vertical axis, a high degree of design flexibility and a stress free structure, which is a main advantage of this type. The vertical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEMS switch designers need to know the relationship between R and contact force to effectively size components and forces to provide stable contact resistance at minimum force [44,57]. Contact resistance has been measured in past studies using actual MEMS switches, atomic force microscopes (AFMs), and an interfacial force microscope (IFM), among others [5,6,8,18,20,27,28,31,37,39,44,47,50,52,[57][58][59][60]. One of the major problems with previous reports of R is a significant inconsistency in results.…”
Section: Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MEMS switch designers need to know the relationship between R and contact force to effectively size components and forces to provide stable contact resistance at minimum force [44,57]. Contact resistance has been measured in past studies using actual MEMS switches, atomic force microscopes (AFMs), and an interfacial force microscope (IFM), among others [5,6,8,18,20,27,28,31,37,39,44,47,50,52,[57][58][59][60]. One of the major problems with previous reports of R is a significant inconsistency in results.…”
Section: Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless otherwise specified, we will limit our discussion to Au-Au contacts. The results vary from study-to-study, and were conducted using different apparatus in either air (at various RH), dry nitrogen, or unspecified environments [20,27,28,31,37,39,44,45,50,52,[57][58][59][60][61][62]. Reported minimum R varied from less than 100 mW to several ohms at loads from 25 lN to 300 mN.…”
Section: Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most switch designs are based on elements moving perpendicular to the wafer surface, requiring complicated multilayer surface micromachining techniques [5]- [7]. Laterally in-wafer-plane moving actuators, on the other hand, allow for uncomplicated bulk micromachining fabrication techniques with a drastically reduced number of process steps, and have already been employed for inline microswitches [8], [9]. However, laterallymoving designs previously reported in the literature, including previous work by the authors [10], are not suitable for switching RF signals since the rigid electrode of the actuator, typically even connected to the ground, must be placed in close vicinity to the moving electrode carrying the RF signal, which creates a large capacitive load resulting in a low characteristic impedance and thus imposing a heavy discontinuity to the transmission line.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the vertical switches, the laterally actuated RF MEMS switches have merits of in-plane design flexibility and simple process (Schiele and Hillerich 1999). Currently, varieties of lateral switches have been reported (Li et al 2000;Wang et al 2004;Shi et al 2007;Simon et al 1998;Kamide and Suzuki 2006;Daneshmand et al 2009;Kang et al 2009), but most of these lateral switches are based on metal contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%