2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07817-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, IOUS is demonstrated to be able to modify preoperative strategy in up to a quarter of cases because of different vascular relationships or new nodules found during surgical exploration, despite the performance of a liver-specific MRI [39][40][41]. Similar results have been described in minimally invasive hepatectomies, with laparoscopic IOUS ensuring adequate perioperative and oncological safety compared to open liver surgery [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Intra-operative Robotic Ultrasound Applicationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, IOUS is demonstrated to be able to modify preoperative strategy in up to a quarter of cases because of different vascular relationships or new nodules found during surgical exploration, despite the performance of a liver-specific MRI [39][40][41]. Similar results have been described in minimally invasive hepatectomies, with laparoscopic IOUS ensuring adequate perioperative and oncological safety compared to open liver surgery [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Intra-operative Robotic Ultrasound Applicationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Compared to traditional open surgery, robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery not only allows for the simultaneous resection of CRLMs and primary CRC, but also reduces intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complication rates, and postoperative hospital stays, while shortening the learning curve due to enhanced 3D full-high definition (HD) vision and wristed instruments ( 38 , 39 ). One study showed that laparoscopic ultrasound has better sensitivity than MRI for CRLMs, especially for lesions located in the liver dome ( 40 ), which may be due to the abnormal MRI signal in the liver dome. As far as we know, relatively few studies of DECT on CRLM have been conducted compared to studies of MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dramatic increase of laparoscopically performed liver resections might also require application of laparoscopic ultrasound; its sensitivity in CRLM detection is superior to that of MRI (93.1% vs. 85.6%, respectively), with similar specificities (96.5% vs. 98.6%, respectively). New nodules might be found in 10.9% of patients, resulting in intraoperative surgical strategy modification in 13% [ 34 â–Ş ].…”
Section: Feasibility Of Intraoperative Ultrasound In the Diagnosis Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%