2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Patients with Endometriosis with and without an Obliterated Cul-de-sac

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Melnyk et al examined 333 patients to determine if there was a difference in intraoperative outcomes in endometriosis patients with and without obliterated cul-de-sacs undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomies between 2012 and 2016 [23]. They found that patients with stage IV endometriosis who also had an obliterated cul-de-sac required laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in addition to other intraoperative procedures compared to those who had stage IV endometriosis without an obliterated cul-de-sac.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Melnyk et al examined 333 patients to determine if there was a difference in intraoperative outcomes in endometriosis patients with and without obliterated cul-de-sacs undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomies between 2012 and 2016 [23]. They found that patients with stage IV endometriosis who also had an obliterated cul-de-sac required laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in addition to other intraoperative procedures compared to those who had stage IV endometriosis without an obliterated cul-de-sac.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous reports, 6 , 8 , 9 the laparoscopic surgeons, in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), are still facing surgical challenges and the risk of extensive retroperitoneal dissection below the level of the uterine artery up to the vaginal vault in cases of severe pelvic endometriosis with a risk of increasing morbidities. The VLH reported here, performed in a reverse direction to that of the conventional laparo-vaginal approach (TLH or LAVH), demonstrated no injury to autonomic pelvic nerves, the rectum or the ureter, and conserved the vaginal length following hysterectomy for severe pelvic endometriosis ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, even in the presence of extensive adhesion formation, which was not the case in our patient, the placement of the double-J stents allowed the ureters to be well demarcated, even where they were hidden among adhesions. Ureteral double-J stenting is also described in the literature, with studies reporting the placement of double-J stents prior to laparoscopic Wertheim surgery for cervical cancer [ 37 ] or complex gynecological surgery for endometriosis [ 38 ] and, more recently, hysterectomy after UTx [ 5 ]. Although a recent study found that laparoscopic hysterectomy may be associated with a higher risk of ureteral injury than abdominal hysterectomy, studies by Chang et al [ 39 ] and Han et al [ 40 ] comparing the clinical efficacy of a temporary ureteral catheter in cervical cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy showed that a ureteral catheter that is placed preoperatively can help to identify the ureter but does not reduce the incidence of ureteral injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%