The following two factors significantly influence estimates of the maximum specific growth rate ( max ) and the lag-phase duration (): (i) the technique used to monitor bacterial growth and (ii) the model fitted to estimate parameters. In this study, nine strains of Listeria monocytogenes were monitored simultaneously by optical density (OD) analysis and by viable count enumeration (VCE) analysis. Four usual growth models were fitted to our data, and estimates of growth parameters were compared from one model to another and from one monitoring technique to another. Our results show that growth parameter estimates depended on the model used to fit data, whereas there were no systematic variations in the estimates of max and when the estimates were based on OD data instead of VCE data. By studying the evolution of OD and VCE simultaneously, we found that while log OD/VCE remained constant for some of our experiments, a visible linear increase occurred during the lag phase for other experiments. We developed a global model that fits both OD and VCE data. This model enabled us to detect for some of our strains an increase in OD during the lag phase. If not taken into account, this phenomenon may lead to an underestimate of .The following two methods are commonly used to monitor growth of bacteria: viable count enumeration (VCE) and absorbance measurement. Monitoring bacterial growth by VCE is time-consuming and rather expensive, but it remains the method of reference. Methods based on absorbance measurements constitute a second family of methods based on the direct proportionality between the optical density (OD) of a liquid medium and the concentration of bacteria. OD techniques are rapid, convenient, and inexpensive. However, many drawbacks are inherent to these techniques. The main problem encountered is the limited range of validity since the detection threshold typically corresponds to a bacterial concentration greater than 10 6 bacteria/ml (8). From these two kinds of data, characteristic growth parameters, mainly the lag-phase duration () and the maximum specific growth rate ( max ), can be assessed. The use of mathematical growth models allows accurate and objective estimation of these parameters. In the field of predictive microbiology, numerous models have been developed. Mechanistic models are especially interesting as they provide both a method of estimating and max and a means of understanding bacterial growth.In fact, the following two potential sources of bias influence estimation of growth parameters: the type of data (OD or VCE) and the model used to fit data. Because of the high detection threshold of OD techniques, the initial inoculum must be large enough to allow reliable measurements, and the question which has arisen is whether the estimates of max at high concentrations are not systematically lower than the actual max because of possible end-of-growth inhibition. Nevertheless, this phenomenon seems to have no effect on the estimates of max (9). Hudson and Mott (14) fitted the modified Gompert...