Comparison of laboratory and clinical computational metrics of acoustic measures of hearing-aid processed speech

Abstract

Computational auditory metrics are used to characterize hearing-aid fittings in the laboratory and the clinic. The purpose of this study is to compare the speech intelligibility index (SII) as a clinical metric to the laboratory based SII and the hearing-aid speech perception index (HASPI) and hearing-aid speech quality index (HASQI) laboratory metrics. These comparisons are drawn from a comprehensive dataset of hearing-aid fittings for 120 hearing-aid recipients from a hospital-based audiology clinic. Hearing-aid devices are drawn from multiple manufacturers and multiple technology levels, and a total of nine hearing-aid devices are included. Acoustic recordings are made with the hearing-aids positioned on the KEMAR manikin and include multiple hearing-aid settings for each patient (manufacturer’s recommended fit, first fit by the audiologist, and the final fitting selected by the patient). Metric values are computed for each of the settings, and these metric comparisons highlight the advantages and challenges of each metric in characterizing hearing-aid signal processing. In addition, the results provide insight regarding hearing-aid fittings from the manufacturer’s fitting versus clinician/patient driven fittings. [Work supported by NIH R01 DC012289, NIH NRSA T32DC012280, and GN Hearing OCG6790B.]