2014 International Conference on Science Engineering and Management Research (ICSEMR) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icsemr.2014.7043602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of K-Means clustering and statistical outliers in reducing medical datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Reduction: It consists of assuming that data follows a specific model, then estimate and store only the parameters of that model [37,41]. It includes several methods, such as Big Data reduction [42], data noise reduction [43], data compression and decompression [44]. • Transformation: It converts the raw data to an appropriate format for further analysis by going through a series of specific steps [45].…”
Section: Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Reduction: It consists of assuming that data follows a specific model, then estimate and store only the parameters of that model [37,41]. It includes several methods, such as Big Data reduction [42], data noise reduction [43], data compression and decompression [44]. • Transformation: It converts the raw data to an appropriate format for further analysis by going through a series of specific steps [45].…”
Section: Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santhanam, T. and Padmavathi, M., S., 2014, [18] compared K-Means clustering and Statistical Outlier detection techniques on cleaned datasets and they found that the reduction rate of Outliers was less than K-Means clustering.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [6] focus on comparing the results of what is termed statistical outliers with K-means for downsizing medical datasets. These researchers note the importance of proper pre-processing to accurate results in data mining.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%