2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-014-3529-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of JEV neutralization assay using pseudotyped JEV with the conventional plaque-reduction neutralization test

Abstract: We previously reported the development of a neutralization assay system for evaluating Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) neutralizing antibody (NAb) using pseudotyped-JEV (JEV-PV). JEV-PV-based neutralization assay offers several advantages compared with the current standard plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT), including simplicity, safety, and speed. To evaluate the suitability of the JEV-PV assay as new replacement neutralization assay, we compared its repeatability, reproducibility, specificity, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the supernatant was ultra-centrifuged at 40,000 g for 4 h at 4°C and the viral pellet was resuspended with PBS at 100:1 (supernatant: suspension) after removing the supernatant thoroughly. After being filtered through 0.22 μm filters, the virus suspension was titrated by conventional plaque assay and stored at −80°C (Lee et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the supernatant was ultra-centrifuged at 40,000 g for 4 h at 4°C and the viral pellet was resuspended with PBS at 100:1 (supernatant: suspension) after removing the supernatant thoroughly. After being filtered through 0.22 μm filters, the virus suspension was titrated by conventional plaque assay and stored at −80°C (Lee et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several conventional diagnostic methods have been developed for the detection of JEV infection, such as, enzyme-linked immunoglobulin assay (ELISA), plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) (Lee et al 2014;Sirivichayakul et al 2014) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Swami et al 2008). Nonetheless, all of these diagnostic techniques have disadvantages such as high cost of consumables, expensive instrumentation and long analysis assay time .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it takes a relatively long time (about 4-5 days) to visualize and count the plaques for the PRNT. To overcome these limitations, alternative neutralization assays using non-infectious virus replicon particles (VRPs) or pseudotyped viruses have been developed (Gläsker et al, 2013;Kishishita et al, 2013;Hu et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2014). Here, we adopted the strategy of expressing the entire structural polyprotein of CHIKV to generate the pseudotyped virus form of KNIH/2009/77 (CHIKVpseudo) for the enhanced infectivity compared to a virion expressing either an individual E1 or E2 protein (Hu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%