2016
DOI: 10.1134/s1022795416120073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ISSR, IRAP and REMAP markers for assessing genetic diversity in different species of Brassica sp.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total mean of band frequency was 0.53 ranged from 0.5 to 0.6, the lowest values of mean band frequency were produced of primers (SCoT-01, while, the highest values of mean band frequency were produced of primers (SCoT-02, SCoT-04 and SCoT-21) these results agreed with Das et al (2014) who indicated that the use of ten primers amplified a total number of 353 bands under 93 loci through 5 mung bean genotypes with an average of 9.3 loci/primer appearing in general polymorphism of 52.7%. However, Mahjoob et al (2016) also showed that higher 𝑀𝐼 value (6.4) than our study using 13 ISSR markers for 35 Brassica genera. The difference between 𝑀𝐼 values with respect to previous studies could be because of different accessions and primers used (Akçali-Giachino, 2020).…”
Section: -+ ---+ + -contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The total mean of band frequency was 0.53 ranged from 0.5 to 0.6, the lowest values of mean band frequency were produced of primers (SCoT-01, while, the highest values of mean band frequency were produced of primers (SCoT-02, SCoT-04 and SCoT-21) these results agreed with Das et al (2014) who indicated that the use of ten primers amplified a total number of 353 bands under 93 loci through 5 mung bean genotypes with an average of 9.3 loci/primer appearing in general polymorphism of 52.7%. However, Mahjoob et al (2016) also showed that higher 𝑀𝐼 value (6.4) than our study using 13 ISSR markers for 35 Brassica genera. The difference between 𝑀𝐼 values with respect to previous studies could be because of different accessions and primers used (Akçali-Giachino, 2020).…”
Section: -+ ---+ + -contrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Molecular analysis using REMAP and ISSR markers is an efficient and inexpensive method to evaluate genetic diversity that has been used repeatedly to determine genetic relationships of many plants (Mahjoob et al 2016;Ghufaili and Al-Tamimi 2017;Cheraghi et al 2018;Vuorinen et al 2018). REMAP markers generate a wide range of band patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REMAP markers generate a wide range of band patterns. They enable identification of polymorphisms between species as well as within a single species or cultivars (Kalendar et al 1999;Branco et al 2007;Mahjoob et al 2016;Cheraghi et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISSRs are generally very effective in genetic diversity studies because of their longer primers compared with RAPD primers (Pradeep Reddy et al, 2002;Tarıkahya-Hacıoğlu, 2016). Likewise, Mahjoob et al (2016) compared different markers such as ISSR, IRAP, and REMAP for the assessment of the genetic diversity within the Brassicaceae family. They reported that ISSR markers showed to be the most e cient for genetic diversity evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%