Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1992
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1739017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IV contrast also allows better evaluation of wall enhancement of appendix, differentiation of pelvic blood vessels from a retro-cecal appendix [ 19 ]. Contrast material cost and reaction risks are definite disadvantages [ 20 , 21 ], though no significant contrast reaction was seen in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…IV contrast also allows better evaluation of wall enhancement of appendix, differentiation of pelvic blood vessels from a retro-cecal appendix [ 19 ]. Contrast material cost and reaction risks are definite disadvantages [ 20 , 21 ], though no significant contrast reaction was seen in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Due to the extremely high solubility in polar protic solvents such as water (up to 1 g/mL), meglumine is widely used to increase the aqueous solubility of drugs such as quercetin in water and both gadolinium-based MR contrast agents , and iodinated contrast agents for intravenous injection. , Frozen, DMSO-prepared fumaric acid samples became cloudy after thawing at room temperature, demonstrating limitation in its use. Its solubility decreases exponentially as the temperature decreases, which is a primary limiting factor to get highly concentrated solutions of the substrate necessary for human usage …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some radiologists appear to be casually aware of this phenomena, to our knowledge this is the first study which compares the incidence of renal streak artifacts produced by LOCA with those produced by HOCA during contrastenhanced abdominal CT. In fact, in a recently published large multi-institutional study which compared image quality in body CT when using iohexol 300 versus diatrizoate meglumine 60, the authors make no mention of degradation of image quality by renal streak artifact [12]. The problem of increased artifact when using LOCA for enhanced renal CT has been alluded to by Bosniak who pointed out that, in his experience, there is an increased number of artifacts when using LOCA and that these must be carefully evaluated when attenuation measurements are made as these artifacts can affect CT numbers and give a false indication of enhancement [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%