2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02671-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of intraoperative and post-operative 3-T MRI performed at 24–72 h following brain tumour resection in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing use of intraoperative MRI, the validity of the final intraoperative scan as the baseline scan has been debated. Based on a single centre study and consensus among the SIOPE brain imaging group, it has been agreed that the final intraoperative MRI scan is now acceptable as the baseline, provided it is from a 3-T scanner (as it has been only validated on 3 T); this SIOPE brain tumour protocol is followed, is supervised by a radiologist experienced in children's brain tumours and is reported in consensus with the operating neurosurgeon [37]. The preoperative and final intraoperative sequences must be comparable.…”
Section: Early Postoperative Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing use of intraoperative MRI, the validity of the final intraoperative scan as the baseline scan has been debated. Based on a single centre study and consensus among the SIOPE brain imaging group, it has been agreed that the final intraoperative MRI scan is now acceptable as the baseline, provided it is from a 3-T scanner (as it has been only validated on 3 T); this SIOPE brain tumour protocol is followed, is supervised by a radiologist experienced in children's brain tumours and is reported in consensus with the operating neurosurgeon [37]. The preoperative and final intraoperative sequences must be comparable.…”
Section: Early Postoperative Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature search on PubMed yielded 128 articles, of which ten met our inclusion criteria ( Figure 1 ; Table 1 ) ( Abernethy et al, 2012 ; Yousaf et al, 2012 ; Avula et al, 2013 ; Ren et al, 2013 ; Giordano et al, 2017 ; Tejada et al, 2018 ; Saint-Martin et al, 2019 ; Low et al, 2020 ; Avula et al, 2021 ; Sunderland et al, 2021 ). Most of these studies were cohort studies, two were case series ( Abernethy et al, 2012 ; Ren et al, 2013 ), one included a review of experience ( Abernethy et al, 2012 ), and one included a comparison of their results to existing literature ( Low et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies that resulted from our PubMed search were performed on either a 1.5 or 3 Tesla MRI scanner. These studies aimed to report the initial ioMRI experience, to evaluate early repeat resection ( Avula et al, 2013 ), to detect ischemic infarcts on diffusion ioMRI ( Saint-Martin et al, 2019 ), or to evaluate ioMRI scans as post-operative scans ( Avula et al, 2021 ). The included studies described a heterogeneous group of histopathological brain tumors with advanced MRI ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In current guidelines, it is only accepted if it has been done on a 3-T scanner, but in our experience, our image quality is good enough to use the final ioMRI at 1.5 T as a baseline examination for future follow-up, although more studies are needed in this area ( 17 , 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%