2016
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2016.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of intramedullary myeloma and corresponding extramedullary soft tissue plasmacytomas using genetic mutational panel analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, suitable PB markers of molecular relapse allowing earlier initiation of treatment are needed. cfDNA is released from multiple independent tumor sites representing the entire tumor genome and seems to be the ideal molecule for further studies.…”
Section: Lymphoid Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, suitable PB markers of molecular relapse allowing earlier initiation of treatment are needed. cfDNA is released from multiple independent tumor sites representing the entire tumor genome and seems to be the ideal molecule for further studies.…”
Section: Lymphoid Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terminal stage of myeloma progression is characterized by stromaindependent growth, which results in extramedullary diseases and plasma cell leukemia. Genetic abnormalities associated with this stage include mutational inactivation of TP53 [13], the protocadherin family [14], and inhibitory components of the NF-κB pathway [15]. In addition, NGS analyses uncovered non-synonymous point mutations of epigenetic regulators such as KDM6A/UTX (10 %), KDM6B/JMJD3, MMSET (8 %), MLL (1 %) and HOXA9 [6,10].…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Action Of Novel Drugs In Multiple Myeloma and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, one patient harboured both KRAS and NRAS mutations highlighting that diversification and heterogeneity in this pathway may exist before the development of symptomatic MM [17]. To date the mutational characterisation of MM has utilised single-site BM biopsies, however, it is now increasingly recognised that such an approach may fail to capture the spatial and temporal genetic heterogeneity of this multi-focal disease, self-evidently with EM MM, but also, based on emerging data, in patients with 'typical MM' manifesting intra-clonal heterogeneity [11,[18][19][20]. Moreover, both spatial and temporal genetic heterogeneity are now recognised as adding to the genetic complexity of the disease as it evolves [21].…”
Section: Multiple Myelomamentioning
confidence: 99%